Successor ignores Hu Jintao’s call for democracy

Xi Jinping

China‘s official media CCTV reports in its prime-time news on Tuesday that Hu Jintao’s designated successor, Xi Jinping, gave a speech at the closing ceremony of the seminar of provincial and ministerial-level officials in Beijing on July 24, 2012.

In spite of Xi’s emphasis on the importance of the swansong speech Hu Jintao delivered to the seminar the day before, we find from the official media’s report, Xi simply ignored Hu’s call for democracy, i.e. democratic election, democratic decision-making, democratic administration and democratic supervision as mentioned in my previous post yesterday.

On the contrary, Xi said, “Our party’s adherence to integration of centralism based on democracy and democracy under centralised guidance has given rise to and maintained its unity and vibrant vigour. That is a tremendous superiority in system.”

What? Instead of Hu’s democratic political reform, Xi wants to stick to Lenin’s notorious democratic centralism which Soviet communists based on for their autocracy and Mao based on for his tyranny. Xi’s speech obviously indicates his unwillingness to carry out the democratic political reform that Hu advocated in his swansong speech.

With the wisdom of a leader who has succeeded in achieving a decade of fast economic growth, Hu is certainly aware of the strong opposition to democratic reform within the party. However, he has attained his goal: he has shown his desire for democracy despite inability to carry out a democratic reform. He has thus cleaned his image and will not be regarded as a conservative against democracy in Chinese history.

As for democracy, I said in my previous post: when Chinese people become richer and better educated, they will strive for democracy and human rights and will obtain democracy and human rights by either transforming or discarding the party. It is unavoidable unless China remains poor and backward.

Categories: Politics & Law

Tags: , , , , , ,

10 replies

  1. Like many readers, I too am of the view that Mr Hu has no leadership attributes. He has little sense of responsibility and of intellectual ability. He has little personal conceptualization and understanding of democracy, and is afraid to take the responsibility of bequeathing democracy to the people but prefers instead to kick the can down the road like a coward. If on his deathbed he bemoan the lack of democracy but the heavy boots of tyranny, no one will will have sympathy for him but the converse.

    Are all Chinese leaders that selfish, irresponsible,and cowardly? Truly, it reflects poorly on our Chinese people.



  1. China’s state media advocates democratic decision-making « China Daily Mail
  2. Pro-democracy army officer joins Chinese military top brass « China Daily Mail
  3. Three factions come out in limelight before reshuffle in China « China Daily Mail
  4. China’s Hu and Wen blasted by party paper editor « China Daily Mail
  5. China’s reserve of talented leaders: Hu Chunhua « China Daily Mail
  6. China’s Jiang Zemin remains the core of party leadership « China Daily Mail
  7. Where in the World is Xi Jinping? « China Daily Mail
  8. China: Balancing Political Ideology and Economic Pragmatism - Rise of the Right

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: