China mouthpiece claims rights over Okinawa

okinawaChina‘s top newspaper on May 8, 2013, published a call for a “reconsideration” of Japan’s sovereignty over the island of Okinawa – home to major US bases – with the Asian powers already embroiled in a territorial row.

The lengthy article in the People’s Daily, China’s most-circulated newspaper and the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist party, argued that China may have rights to the Ryukyu island chain, which includes Okinawa.

“Unresolved problems on the Ryukyu Islands have reached the time for reconsideration,” wrote Zhang Haipeng and Li Guoqiang, citing post World War II declarations which require Japan to return Chinese territory.

The authors are scholars at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, considered China’s top state-run think tank.

The article also repeated Chinese government arguments for China’s historical claims over a set of tiny uninhabited islets in the East China Sea known as Diaoyu in Chinese and Senkaku in Japanese.

The two nations have stepped up a war of words over the dispute in recent months, with Beijing’s vessels regularly entering the waters around the Tokyo-controlled islands, stoking fears of armed conflict.

Okinawa is the biggest of the Ryukyu islands, which stretch for about 1,000 kilometres (620 miles) from Japan’s mainland, and was the centre of the Ryukyuan kingdom which paid tribute to Chinese emperors until it was absorbed by Japan in 1879.

The island is home to major US air force and marine bases as well as 1.3 million people, who are considered more closely related to Japan in ethnic and linguistic terms than to China.

But some Chinese see historical ties as a basis for sovereignty and dismiss Japan’s possession of the islands as a legacy of its aggressive expansionism that ended in defeat at the end of the Second World War.

China’s government does not make such claims, but state media have from time to time carried articles and commentaries questioning Japan’s authority.

Source: Bangkok Post – China scholars claim right to Okinawa 


Categories: Politics & Law

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

13 replies

  1. Reblogged this on middlekingdom1of10boyz and commented:
    Another problem the UN won’t be able to solve. I am quite certain that the pre-WWII land acquisitions by Japan (say anything that occurred before the 1895 conflict was not intended to be included). The real problem is that the Chinese are now “experts” at reading treaties and such to their own benefit. We will likely hear more of these kinds of claims and the associated saber rattling.
    The next exciting one will be the “historical” claim to the Korean penis by the Chinese. That one should make Lil’ Kim excited to know that he really “is” a puppet leader.


    • The Treaty of San Francisco originally returned territory Japan had seized during WWII. It was later amended to include territory Japan had seized back until 1900. It does not include the territory China ceded after it’s loss to Japan in the war of 1895 (including Senkakus and Taiwan). Nor does it include territory that never belonged to China. The Ryukyus were an independent state, that were merged with Japan in 1879. Taiwan, the Senkakus and the Ryukyus were acquired by Japan well before the date (1900) set in the Treaty of San Francisco.


  2. Reblogged this on Oyia Brown.



  1. China criticises Japan’s protest over question of Okinawa sovereignty | China Daily Mail
  2. China’s stealth wars of acquisition. | China Daily Mail
  3. China’s Evolving ‘Core Interests’ | China Daily Mail
  4. China says Okinawa doesn’t belong to Japan | China Daily Mail
  5. China supports Ryukyu independence organisation; Japan no longer a friendly neighbour | China Daily Mail
  6. China says Japan should honour its surrender, and withdraw from the Ryukyus | China Daily Mail
  7. China not disputing Japan’s sovereignty over Okinawa | China Daily Mail
  8. China’s grand military parade ‘meant to deter Japan and corrupt officials’ | China Daily Mail
  9. Japan’s master plan to defeat China in a war | China Daily Mail

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: