South China Sea dispute: lucky China, unlucky Philippines

China South China Sea Claim

China’s South China Sea Claim

I write this post due to Mr. Jose Mario Dolor De Vega’s furious response to my post China boasts of strategy to ‘recover’ islands occupied by Philippines at China Daily Mail on May 28.

First, I should make clear that the strategy mentioned in the post is neither my strategy nor China’s strategy as proved by Chinese government’s recent words and actions. I sincerely hope that Chinese and Filipino peoples maintain their traditional friendship.

My daughter has a Filipino housekeeping assistant mainly to take care of my granddaughter Piao Piao. The assistant loves Piao Piao so dearly that Piao Piao is very close to her, closer perhaps than to Piao Piao’s mother.

I am always very grateful to her for taking such good care of my granddaughter and we are good friends. Why shall the dispute over some tiny islands, in fact mostly reefs, turn us into enemies?

I do not see anything in the report I translated and posted that may stir up enmity between Chinese and Filipino peoples though I made the mistake in regarding Major General Zhang Zhaozhong’s strategy as China’s strategy because he said that in an interview with CCTV, an authoritative Chinese media. Moreover, it was precisely what China did in dealing with the incident at Scarborough Shoal.

Major General Zhang made me believe that China would drive Filipino troops away from the shipwreck at Ren’ai Shoal (Second Thomas Shoal) by cutting off their supplies of water and food. However, at a routine press conference of China’s Defence Ministry on May 30, to a reporter’s question “a Filipino official said today that the Chinese warships converged at the South China Sea area around the Ren’ai Shoal will cut off Filipino military personnel’s supplies of water and food. Please confirm,” Chinese Defence Ministry spokesman Geng Yansheng said, “It is necessary to make clear that Philippines side’s allegation has no support of fact at all.”

Obviously, Zhang’s strategy is not Chinese government’s strategy.

I posted the news about what the Chinese Ministry spokesman said on May 31, but perhaps Mr. De Vego did not see that. Anyway, I owe Mr. De Vega an apology if my post on the “cabbage strategy” made him believe that the strategy is Chinese government’s strategy. I am sorry, Mr. De Vego.

Mr. De Vego’s post obviously will stir up Chinese people’s enmity against Filipino peoples by saying “his country (meaning China) is a mere dirty scavenger, thieves and pirates of the worst kind”.

Territorial dispute is a very complicated issue. No wonder even some Chinese officials are ignorant what is the basis of China’s claim. However, there are certainly sound basis for China’s claim including lots of documents and maps from Yuan Dynasty up to now.

When I studied geography at primary school, Nansha Islands (the Spratly) and the nine-dash line were already in the map we studied. At that time China was the Republic of China before the Communist takeover in 1949.

Taiwan (the Republic of China (ROC))’s claim to the sovereignty of those islands, reefs and sea areas is identical to China’s. The PRC has just inherited ROC’s claim that in 1949. The speculation about the rich oil and gas resources in those sea areas emerged decades later. Therefore, accusing China as “dirty thieves and pirates” who want to grab the islands, reefs and sea areas because of the resources is entirely groundless and will hurt Chinese people’s feeling.

The republic of China has claimed sovereignty since 1911, several Chinese dynasties claimed sovereignty before 1911.

Even if you had better grounds to claim sovereignty than China, you should not use such insulting and abusive language.

Perhaps, such language is common now in Filipino media aiming at stirring up Filipino people’s enmity against Chinese people. However, I do not think such language is suitable for a well-educated university lecturer before he has made himself well informed about the issue.

Perhaps you believe Taiwan is a country other than China. In the Shanghai Communique of the US and China dated February 28, 1972, the US said, “The United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States Government does not challenge that position.” That was in 1972.

What is the situation now? The KMT, the ruling party, in Taiwan and the Chinese Communist Party, the ruling party on the Chinese mainland, both uphold the “consensus of 1992” that there is only one China.

The one China on both sides of the Taiwan Strait has identical claim to the islands, reefs and sea area, i.e. Chinese people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait have claimed sovereignty of the islands, reefs and sea areas since at least 1911.

Major General Zhang’s strategy obviously indicated Chinese people’s unwillingness to fight a war for those islands and reefs, but Mr. De Vego is bellicose. He talks a lot about a war between the Philippines and China in his post.

On January 29 and June 28, 2012, I respectively placed my posts titled China’s greater Asia co-prosperity sphere and China’s dream of a greater Asia co-prosperity sphere to give my speculation on Chinese leaders’ intention to establish an organisation like the EU for prosperity of all the countries in East and Southeast Asia.

As I was for a time close to the new generation of talented intellectuals with moral integrity that emerged during the Cultural Revolution and has seized state power now, I am familiar with their mindset. What the Chinese top leader has recently done proves that I am right.

In early June, Xi Jinping sent Lieutenant General Qi Jianguo to launch a charm offensive at the annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore to stress that China wanted peace and was willing to leave the disputes over the islands in East and South China Seas to future generations.

SCMP says in its relevant reports, “On June 19, Chinese President Xi Jinping told his visiting Vietnamese counterpart of Wednesday that maintaining peace and stability in the contested South China Sea was vital for both countries, who should remember their traditional friendship.”

“On June 20, the presidents of China and Vietnam set up a hotline to defuse territorial disputes and expanded a 2006 agreement to jointly explore for oil in the Gulf of Tonkin,” (refer to my posts titled China tells Vietnam it wants peace in South China Sea here and Beijing, Hanoi set up hotline, sign oil deal during visit by Viet president in my blog

As for the disputes between China and the Philippines, I would like to say that China is very lucky while the Philippines is unlucky. Why?

First of all, Chinese people regard as top priority keeping the legacy they have inherit from their ancestors, but such legacy may perhaps be useless or even an expensive burden.

When I studied Chinese geography about Nansha Islands at primary school, I wondered what was the benefit to have those remote uninhabitable islands. They seemed to me expensive burdens that China had to incur lots of expenses to safeguard its sovereignty over them.

However, it turns out that the sea areas around those islands may have rich oil and gas resources and are of strategic importance.

The burdens China inherited have turned out to be treasures.

What good luck!

However China seems unlucky that such treasures have attracted quite a few contenders, especially as China was weak and poor for quite a long time in the past and seemed unable to keep the treasures from being taken away by contenders.

Surprisingly, China has become rich and powerful in a few decades and able to protect those treasures.

What good luck!

On the Philippine side, at the beginning of the 20th century, the United States offered the Philippines the choice to become a state of the United States, but was rejected. If the Philippines had become a part of the US, perhaps the US would have developed those islands and reefs long ago and extracted all the oil and gas in the sea areas there. At that time, China had neither navy nor commercial fleet to counter the United States.

Later, there were US navy and air force bases in the Philippines and the islands, reefs and sea areas were in fact under US control while Mao Zedong neglected development of Chinese navy, but used all Chinese resources for the development of atomic bombs and ICBMs for world hegemony. If the Philippines had seized all the islands, reefs and sea areas in dispute at that time, China would have had great difficulties to recover them.

Luckily, the Philippines drove away the US and took back the bases to deprive the US of the obligations to spend lots of money for the defense of the Philippines. At that time, we were really very happy about that as we were worried that US presence would make it very difficult for China to maintain its sovereignty to the islands, reefs and sea areas given that it took time for China to develop its navy.

When the Philippines began to contend with China for the islands, reefs and sea areas, China had grown relatively rich and was developing its navy quite quickly. Still, the Philippines has occupied some shoals and China and the Philippines both patrolled and fished in the rich fishing area around Scarborough Shoal.

In my opinion, even though China has sovereignty over Scarborough Shoal, the two countries shall maintain the previous status quo. China shall allow Filipino fishermen to fish there as like Chinese fishermen, quite a few Filipino fishermen had been fishing there for generations; therefore, before the standoff there, China did not drive away Filipino fishermen from the sea area though perhaps, China had the intention to do so.

Luckily for China, Filipino navy tried to drive away Chinese fishermen and provided  China with the excuse to drive away Filipino fishermen. China is thus very lucky to gain complete control of Scarborough Shoal peacefully.

Luckily again, Filipino coast guards fired at Taiwanese fishermen and killed one of them. As China regards Taiwan as a part of China, it has given China further excuse to drive away Filipino fishermen when China thinks fit.

China was not so lucky with Ren’ai Shoal (Second Thomas Shoal). If the Philippines had sent building materials to stabilise it shipwreck there, China would have had the excuse to drive Filipino troops from the shoal, but the Philippines did not give China such a chance.

By my post “China boasts of strategy to ‘recover’ islands occupied by Philippines”, I provided Filipino and world people with the information on possible Chinese strategy. I believe, if Mr. De Vego had not been so furious as to lose his mind, he would have made calm analysis and known what the Philippines had better do to avoid making China lucky and the Philippines unlucky.

Categories: Politics & Law

Tags: , , , , , , ,

10 replies

  1. My name is Jose Mario Dolor DE VEGA, not DE VEGO!



  2. As a Chinese, I certainly support my government’s claim, but I respect your right to express you view and will never use insulting and abusive language to deal with Filipino people, in spite of the dispute.

    I hope that you understand that if the two sides do not each uphold its claim there will be no dispute at all. However, as I am no expert nor have the authority to resolve the dispute, I would rather leave the dispute to be resolved by those who have expertise and authority to make decision.

    In the meantime, I still wish Filipino people good luck and their country prosperity.


  3. I refer to CHANKAIYEE2 ’s post on June 22 “South China Sea dispute: lucky China, unlucky Philippines”

    In [a quote] from that, Chankaiyee points out “Obviously, Zhang’s strategy is not Chinese government’s strategy.”

    But, on Nov 23, 2012, he posted “China anger neighbors with sea claims on new passports”

    And that, friends IS an official strategy that China will use to justify future actions.



    • I shall make clear that all my reblogs on China Daily Mail without any change made by me in the original blogs do not contain my views in the content of the reblogged posts, though by reblogging, I display my attitude towards the original posts, i.e. I believed that it was worthwhile to recommend the blogs to readers of China Daily Mail.

      That is the case with the reblog titled “China angers neighbours with sea claims on new passports”. It is entirely a reblog of Reuters report with the same title. I do not express any of my views on the content of the report.

      I hereby clarify that so that you will not mistake any views in that reblog as mine.

      If I add something to it in reblogging a piece, what I have added is mine and I am responsible for it. That is the case with my reblog of’s “Zhang Zhaozhong: To recover the islands occupied by the Philippines, the ‘cabbage’ strategy is enough” because I changed its title into “China boasts of strategy to ‘recover’ islands occupied by Philippines” in reblogging it and thus cause readers to mistake the strategy suggested by Zhang as China’s strategy. For that I appologized to Mr. Jose Mario Dolor De Vega in my post “South China Sea dispute: lucky China, unlucky Philippines”.

      I hereby appologize to all other readers who mistake Zhang’s strategy as China’s due to that reblog.

      If a reblog contains any passage or note written by me, I am responsible for what I write. So are the posts entirely written by me such as “South China Sea dispute: lucky China, unlucky Philippines”.

      I welcome readers’ posts and comments on anything written by me that may be controversial to them, but they are advised not to use insulting or abusive language that may stir up enmity between Chinese and Filipino peoples.

      I certainly will argue with them if necessary at my blog site, or at China Daily Mail if Mr. Craig Hill allowed, but I will disregard any posts and comments that use insulting or abusive language that may stir up enmity between the two great peoples.


      • Agreed Chan Kai Ye. This forum welcomes opinions, whether for or against China, and disagreement from others about those opinions.

        However, we do not welcome direct personal attacks, abuse or insults against the writers.



  1. South China Sea dispute: Who is bullying who? | China Daily Mail
  2. China media warns Philippines of ‘counterstrike’ in South China Sea | China Daily Mail
  3. China warns Philippines of ‘counterstrike’ in South China Sea | China Daily Mail
  4. Newly discovered ancient maps support Chinese territorial claims | China Daily Mail
  5. Aquino Desperate in Hinting UN, ASEAN Appeasing China | Tiananmen's Tremendous Achievements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: