No Chinese ‘Kung Fu’ in Hong Kong riot

Hong Kong Riot

Hong Kong Riot

Yes, although Hong Kong has been famous for its ‘kung fu’ movies for decades, the scene of ‘one defeats five or six’ was nowhere to be found in its infamous eight-hour long riot on Feb 8/9 overnight local time.

What was really taking place there was simply arbitrary and brutal combats with fists, metal bars, rubbish bins, bricks, trolleys and alike between the messily organized police force (many officers were on leave for the Lunar New Year celebration) and hundreds of youngsters, thus leaving more than seventy policemen and three journalists wounded.

The so-called ‘kung fu’, or Chinese martial arts, can be traced back to certain physical exercises practiced by the Buddhist monks in ancient times during the Tang Dynasty (618-907).

Through idolisation by several series of popular fictions, some writers claimed that these practices evolved into a number of ‘schools’ of modules over the past hundreds of years and that a master-grade fighter could triumph over ten or more opponents.

What may be closer to the truth is that when the monks, who were supposed to believe in nothingness in the present world and to wait for their next life at a higher level after death in the due course of metempsychosis, they lived like hermits. To maintain their physiological health for, say, joints and ankles, the monks practiced some physical exercises as a sort of routine in their daily life, alongside farming (for biological strength) and studying (for the soul’s purity).

Therefore, the motion was very slow, mainly to relax their muscle or stretch their tendon after a long time of meditation. It was never to be meant for aggression, not to mention fatal strike. If there must be a reason to connect such a daily routine with the secular community, it was essentially for self-defence — to protect themselves from the bandits.

Without practical benefits, very few Han Chinese in reality learn and practice ‘kung fu’. It was not an interesting feature of the Chinese culture until Bruce Lee (1940-73) made a fundamental change to it.

Having understood the slow nature and uselessness of ‘kung fu’, the greatly talented Lee trained his body crazy hard in general and legs in particular to develop ‘Jee Kune Do’ to speed it up. He did it. Spectators said Lee’s kick was so swift that the shadow of his legs’ locus could not be “seen” at all. Lee uplifted his fight module to the combat level and to the extent that he was able to have a real fight even with the tall and muscular American fighters.

Unfortunately, so far, Lee was the only one who was able to move his legs (particularly the left leg) sufficiently fast and furious for real fight. What all others can achieve is to turn ‘kung fu’ into show business for entertainment, or sports, or artistic performance. Therefore, despite a hearsay that some of those arrested have been trained with modern wrestling techniques, ‘kung fu’ was absent from the Hong Kong riot.

If there is a philosophical or political meaning for ‘kung fu’ in the Chinese culture, I would say it is the spirit of self-defense. The Han Chinese is not a truculent nation. Their ideal has always been scholarly Confucian intellectuality. A simple look back to history will tell you that they focused on poems and dissertations to the extent that they lost their mainland first to the Mongolians (Yuan Dynasty 1271-1368) and then to the Manchurians (Qing Dynasty 1644-1912).

The fireworks and firecrackers invented by the ancient Han Chinese were for fun, festival celebrations and signalling during battles. Rather, it was the Arabians and then the Europeans who transformed them into guns and bombs. Both ‘kung fu’ and various self-defence capabilities of any form failed them repeatedly in the past one thousand years. What the Han Chinese on the mainland doing right now is still struggling to have their self-defence capacity upgraded to the level that humiliation to their legacy will not happen again. By all means, the ultimate goal of all Chinese modernisations is the same as ‘kung fu’ — self-defence.

Categories: History

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

3 replies

  1. well said. GONG XI FA CAI !



  1. Hao Hao Report
  2. Chinese Kung Fu and Confucianism are not ‘Killer Apps’ | China Daily Mail

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: