US-China trade deal obstructed by dispute over Taiwan

No breakthrough in US-China trade talk during Treasury Secretary Mnuchin’s visit to Beijing in May 3-4 (photo from South China Morning Post)

The US-China negotiation atmosphere was not bad 2 days before the American team, which was headed by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, went to China.

When the delegation team landed on Beijing on May 3 Thursday, “Trump tweeted: ‘Our great financial team is in China trying to negotiate a level playing field on trade! I look forward to being with President Xi in the not too distant future. We will always have a good (great) relationship!’”

On May 4 Friday, Bloomberg even could obtain (actually, was provided with) the lists from the U.S. and China showing what were demanded of each other on trade. The items all looked normal, as expected, and, most importantly, negotiable.

All of a sudden, Mnuchin returned home empty-handed and the anticipated meeting with Xi did not materialize.

Then on May 5 Saturday, the White House “sharply criticized China’s efforts to force foreign airlines to change how they refer to Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau, labeling China’s latest effort to police language describing the politically sensitive territories as “Orwellian nonsense.” Here is the core of the problem.

Over the past 50 years or longer, when someone needed international postage, delivery or alike, there was a list of ‘countries’ for the user to pick so as to specify the address and pay for the fees accordingly. Before 1997, Hong Kong and Macau were colonies, and Taiwan was outside the jurisdiction of the People’s Republic of China after the CCP-KMT civil war 1945-9. Therefore, many other countries’ firms put China (PRC), Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau on the list separately so as to arrange for different transportation routes and other issues such as tax and customs. As Beijing was relatively weak, it had no say about it.

After 1997, Hong Kong and Macau are special administrative regions (SAR) of China. Hong Kong, for example, is part of China, and therefore the official name is China-Hong Kong SAR. Obviously, Beijing is making an effort to take one step further by asking those nations who adopt the ‘One China Policy’ to change the status of Taiwan in that list to become ‘China-Taiwan’.

As the sovereignty issues in Hong Kong and Macau have been very definite and clear, what remains is Taiwan’s. Since it was the White House, at its highest height, to criticize Beijing’s request for modifying the country list for the purpose of recognizing China’s sovereignty over Taiwan Island, it means a lot. Among other things, one point is urgent and clear: the Trump administration and Washington as a whole are going to stir up trouble between Beijing and Taiwan, as what I said as early as in Jan and again in Feb.

When the White House is willing to abandon a chance for success at the beginning stage of the trade talk for this dispute, it carries at least two implications. One is that even China has made concessions on the trade front, Washington will demand more if Beijing wants something elsewhere in spite of the ‘smallness’ of such a request regarding a country list.

Another one is that Washington has already determined to irritate Beijing to the extent that it must take military force against Taipei.

The opinions expressed are those of the author, and not necessarily those of China Daily Mail.

Categories: Politics & Law

Tags: , , , ,

2 replies

  1. “one point is urgent and clear: the Trump administration and Washington as a whole are going to stir up trouble between Beijing and Taiwan”

    The author speaks as a Chinese communist nationalist imperialist. Xi and his Communist Party has made clear their intentions to take over the world if they can get away with it. Xi’s demand to rename Taiwan is outrageous. The Trump Administration is correct to call this demand Orwellian nonsense. It is the Chi-Coms that stir the trouble as they have been doing for decades with ridiculous demands of other nations to permit pirating of intellectual property. The Chi-Coms have only contempt for property rights. After they blow up relations with their foremost trading partner (US), other investors will abandon China as the middle kingdom attempts to nationalize (steal) its way to prosperity. This will dump China into poverty and social unrest, all due to Xi’s prideful miscalculations and devotion to a morally corrupt ideology (Marxism) – an ideology responsible for the deaths of nearly 100 million souls in the 20th century, half by Mao. The Chi-coms, having wrecked their own country in the 20th century, now hope to export their destructive, thieving, and murderous ideas in the 21st century.

    “Washington will demand more if Beijing wants something elsewhere in spite of the ‘smallness’ of such a request regarding a country list”

    There is nothing of smallness in Xi’s demand. Words have power. Choose carefully your words, for the pen is mightier than the sword. This Xi knows as do you. Your words expose you as a naked propagandist for an evil regime. May Marxism know at last the death ideologically that it has visited on so many souls, literally. It cannot happen too soon.

    Liked by 1 person


  1. China’s top negotiator underperformed his job in the China-US trade talk | China Daily Mail

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: